DOJ Sues RegalCare for Millions in Medicare Fraud Across 19 Nursing Facilities in Massachusetts and Connecticut

The Devastating Reality: How Poor Training Enabled Systematic Medicare Fraud

In February 2025, the Department of Justice delivered a crushing blow to RegalCare Management Group, filing a federal lawsuit that exposed how inadequate compliance training at 19 nursing facilities across Massachusetts and Connecticut enabled one of the most systematic Medicare fraud schemes in recent memory. The case serves as a stark reminder that when healthcare organizations fail to invest in proper compliance education and training protocols, the consequences extend far beyond regulatory violations—they can destroy entire operations and betray the trust of vulnerable patients who depend on skilled nursing care.

The U.S. Attorney's Office filed a joint complaint with the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office against RegalCare Management Group, its owner Eliyahu Mirlis, executive Hector Caraballo, and therapy consultant Stern Therapy for systematically defrauding Medicare and Medicaid of millions of dollars between 2017 and 2023. This wasn't a case of isolated billing errors or administrative mistakes—it was a calculated scheme that revealed fundamental failures in training, oversight, and ethical standards that should serve as a warning to every healthcare facility operating today.

The Anatomy of a Compliance Training Disaster

The RegalCare case exposes three critical training failures that transformed routine billing operations into a criminal enterprise. First, staff clearly lacked fundamental education about Medicare billing requirements and clinical documentation standards. Caraballo facilitated the fraud by altering and amending patient records despite knowing he was not authorized to do so at his licensing level, without having assessed or spoken to the patients. This represents a catastrophic failure in basic compliance training—any properly trained healthcare professional should understand the legal and ethical boundaries of their role and the severe consequences of unauthorized medical record alterations.

Second, the billing department operated without adequate training on Medicare's skilled rehabilitation therapy requirements. RegalCare improperly directed their third-party billing company to bill Medicare for the highest-level skilled rehabilitation therapy services before the underlying necessary clinical documentation was even complete. This practice violates fundamental Medicare billing principles that require documentation to support services before claims submission—a concept that should be reinforced through regular compliance training programs.

Third, the organization failed to create a culture where staff felt empowered to resist unethical directives. When Stern therapists refused to provide services they deemed unnecessary or unreasonable, Stern managers threatened to take employment action against those therapists to pressure them to capitulate. This reveals the absence of robust whistleblower protections and ethical training that should encourage staff to report concerns without fear of retaliation.

The Escalating Financial Stakes of Non-Compliance

Healthcare fraud penalties have reached unprecedented levels, making compliance training not just an ethical imperative but a critical financial protection strategy. The 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown resulted in criminal charges against 324 defendants for their alleged participation in various health care fraud schemes involving over $14.6 billion in intended loss. These numbers represent more than statistics—they reflect the government's increasingly aggressive stance toward healthcare fraud and the devastating financial consequences facing organizations that fail to maintain robust compliance programs.

The financial penalties for healthcare fraud have become particularly severe for skilled nursing facilities. Filing false claims may result in fines of up to three times the programs' loss plus $11,000 per claim filed, and under the civil False Claims Act, each instance of an item or service billed to Medicare or Medicaid counts as a claim, so fines can add up quickly. For facilities like RegalCare that submitted thousands of fraudulent claims over multiple years, these penalties can easily reach tens of millions of dollars and force complete operational shutdown.

Adding to these federal penalties, CMS has significantly increased its enforcement powers for 2025. This final rule changes CMS' enforcement policies to impose more equitable and consistent civil monetary penalties for health and safety violations as part of CMS' ongoing work to ensure all residents living in Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing homes receive safe, quality care. Facilities now face the possibility of multiple penalties from a single survey, both per-day and per-instance fines, and penalties based on a longer three-survey lookback period.

The True Cost of Inadequate Training

While healthcare organizations often view compliance training as a regulatory burden or cost center, the RegalCare case demonstrates that inadequate training represents one of the highest-risk investments—or lack thereof—that facilities can make. The millions of dollars RegalCare allegedly defrauded from Medicare and Medicaid could have funded comprehensive compliance training programs for decades. Instead, the organization now faces potential fines that could reach hundreds of millions of dollars, criminal prosecution of executives, and the complete destruction of their business model.

The Department of Justice has made clear that healthcare fraud enforcement remains a top priority. In 2024, the DOJ False Claims Act settlements and judgements exceeded $2.9 billion, and this trend shows no signs of slowing. Government officials have committed to aggressive enforcement, with Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Granston emphasizing that the DOJ "plans to continue to aggressively enforce the False Claims Act" because the "return on investment" makes these enforcement efforts a worthwhile use of government resources.

Essential Components of Fraud-Prevention Training Programs

Effective compliance training programs must address the specific vulnerabilities that enabled the RegalCare fraud scheme. Healthcare organizations should implement comprehensive education covering Medicare billing requirements, clinical documentation standards, and the legal boundaries of various staff roles. Training must emphasize that healthcare professionals cannot alter medical records outside their scope of practice and must never bill for services before proper documentation is complete.

Organizations and facilities that participate in federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, must have a compliance program that addresses fraud, waste, and abuse. These programs should include regular training on the five major federal fraud and abuse laws: the False Claims Act, Anti-Kickback Statute, Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark Law), Exclusion Authorities, and Civil Monetary Penalties Law. Staff must understand not only what these laws prohibit but also the severe personal and organizational consequences of violations.

Training programs must also create clear reporting mechanisms and whistleblower protections. The RegalCare case involved therapists who recognized inappropriate care but were threatened with employment action when they refused to participate. Effective compliance programs empower staff to report concerns without fear of retaliation and provide clear escalation procedures when management pressures employees to engage in questionable practices.

The Technology Advantage in Compliance Training

Modern healthcare organizations must leverage technology to deliver consistent, trackable, and regularly updated compliance training. Online learning management systems enable facilities to ensure every staff member receives identical training content, track completion rates, and document training efforts for regulatory audits. These systems also allow for rapid updates when regulations change—a critical capability given the evolving nature of healthcare compliance requirements.

Scenario-based training modules can help staff navigate complex ethical situations like those that arose at RegalCare. Interactive training that presents realistic dilemmas—such as pressure from supervisors to provide unnecessary services or alter documentation—helps staff develop the confidence and knowledge to make appropriate decisions when facing similar situations in their daily work.

Lessons for Healthcare Leaders

The RegalCare case represents far more than a cautionary tale about healthcare fraud—it demonstrates how inadequate training can transform well-intentioned healthcare organizations into criminal enterprises. Healthcare leaders must recognize that compliance training is not a checkbox exercise but a fundamental operational requirement that protects patients, staff, and the organization's mission.

Organizations that view compliance training as an optional expense rather than essential infrastructure are gambling with their entire future. The cost of comprehensive training programs—even sophisticated, technology-enhanced systems—represents a fraction of the potential penalties, legal fees, and reputational damage that result from fraud allegations. More importantly, proper training ensures that healthcare organizations fulfill their primary mission of providing ethical, high-quality care to the patients who depend on them.

As healthcare fraud enforcement continues to intensify and penalties reach record levels, the organizations that survive and thrive will be those that make compliance training a cornerstone of their operations. The RegalCare case serves as a stark reminder that in today's healthcare environment, inadequate training is not just a risk—it's a pathway to organizational destruction that no healthcare leader can afford to ignore.

The difference between organizations that thrive and those that face criminal prosecution often comes down to a single factor: their commitment to comprehensive, ongoing compliance training that empowers staff to make ethical decisions even under pressure.